I are an English Genius!!


English Genius


You scored 78% Beginner, 85% Intermediate, 87% Advanced, and 76% Expert!
You did so extremely well, even I can’t find a word to describe your excellence! You have the uncommon intelligence necessary to understand things that most people don’t. You have an extensive vocabulary, and you’re not afraid to use it properly! Way to go!

Thank you so much for taking my test. I hope you enjoyed it!

For the complete Answer Key, visit my blog:http://shortredhead78.blogspot.com/

My test tracked 4 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:

You scored higher than 10% on Beginner
You scored higher than 13% on Intermediate
You scored higher than 21% on Advanced
You scored higher than 71% on Expert

Link: The Commonly Confused Words Test written by shortredhead78 on OkCupid Online Dating

Religion….hmmm….

It’s funny that I took this quize very early Easter Sunday morning……

You scored as Satanism. Your beliefs most closely resemble those of Satanism! Before you scream, do a bit of research on it. To be a Satanist, you don’t actually have to believe in Satan. Satanism generally focuses upon the spiritual advancement of the self, rather than upon submission to a deity or a set of moral codes. Do some research if you immediately think of the satanic cult stereotype. Your beliefs may also resemble those of earth-based religions such as paganism.

Satanism
 
83%
Islam
 
71%
Buddhism
 
67%
agnosticism
 
67%
Paganism
 
63%
Hinduism
 
58%
atheism
 
58%
Christianity
 
46%
Judaism
 
33%

Which religion is the right one for you? (new version)

created with QuizFarm.com

Tweaks

I tweak a few things in the way the system operates. I also added a few scripts to help the functioning of the site. Nothing anyone will probably notice, its all mainly stuff in the back end. I did add a category for all those bizzar little quizes and such. I am hoping to add a few more scripts for the back end as well. All in all I am pretty happy with the way the site is functioning so there prolly wont be to many more things going on with it. So…umm…yeah.

Who wrote The Matrix?

The answer to this question, for most of us whom have seen the movie, is simple: the Wachowski Brothers. However, tonight I stumbled on an article that contradics that statement. It seems that an African American woman by the name of Sophia Stewart actually penned the original manuscript that The Matrix is based off of, and has been in a court battle over copyright infringement. In adition to this, the article also suggests that Sophia is also responsible for the Terminator movies as well!

Stewart filed her case in 1999, after viewing the Matrix, which she felt had been based on her manuscript, “The Third Eye,” copyrighted in 1981. In the mid-eighties Stewart had submitted her manuscript to an ad placed by the Wachowski Brothers, requesting new sci-fi works.

According to court documentation, an FBI investigation discovered that more than thirty minutes had been edited from the original film, in an attempt to avoid penalties for copyright infringement. The investigation also stated that “credible witnesses employed at Warner Brothers came forward, claiming that the executives and lawyers had full knowledge that the work in question did not belong to the Wachowski Brothers.” These witnesses claimed to have seen Stewart’s original work and that it had been “often used during preparation of the motion pictures.

A quick search on Google for Sophia Stewart returns a ton of links. From what I can tell Da Ghetto Tymz appears to have the most information, including what appears to be PDF files of court documents. There is even reports that the movie had been edited from the original movie “that aired in theaterz March 31, 1999.”

…when [Sophia] first saw the movie back in ’99, she witnessed blatant theft and plagiarizm from her script, ‘The Third Eye’ written and copywritten back in 1983. Soon after, she contacted the Pirates informing them she was aware of the theft and a demand for credit and compensation for what soon became the most successfull movie franchise to date. Not too long after, Warner Bros. allegedly began released versionz of The Matrix edited from the 2 hour and 40 minute original.

….

Apparently, there are various scenes that are different from the later released version(s) which will enable you to know you have the original release:

* In the beginning of the movie, there’s an intro that scrolls up the screen just like in the movie Star Wars that layz out the plot. It speaks of a nuclear war that happened in the year 2110AD, where humanz were now used as fuel for the machines like batteries
* In the part where Neo barters for a stack of programz for programz of his. No money was exchanged like in the edited release(s)
* The girl in the beginning who came over Neo’s had a rabbit on her arm. In the edited version(s), she’s seen with the rabbit on her back shoulder blade

Now I remember seeing the movie opening day at a movie theater just outside Glenside PA with some friends, and I don’t remember those defferences, but I guess anything is possible.

In all honesty, in the end, I really don’t care who wrote the movie. If it is truly based off someone elses work though, they should be given proper credit. The fact remains that The Matrix is a great movie.

Marvel Characters

Having not read a lot of comics growing up it is surprising how much I actually know about comic book characters. With all the movies recently coming out based off of Marvel characters it would be nice to know even more. I somehow managed to help myself in this pursuit by accidentally stumbaling upon the Marvel Directory. This site is a database of (possibly all?) Marvel characters, contianing information on each individual and group. It is searchable by a number of categories including individual, locations, and strength levels, and is also browsable by alphabetical order. In adition you are even given the option to upload information should you happen to have any that is already not listed.

Logic


You Are Pretty Logical

logic image
(You got 63% of the questions right)You’re a bit of a wizard when it comes to logic. While you don’t have perfect logic, your logic is pretty darn good. Keep at it – you’ve got a lot of natural talent in this area!

Stopping Identity Theft

Identity theft is a serious issue for everyone. Having your identity stolen can cause serious harm for you and your loved ones. The most common damage caused by identity theft is financial. I happened to stumble upon this article over on MSN Money which offers a few good tips on how to help prevent identify theft from happening to you. In addition the article also contains links to good articles on keeping your Social Security number safe and cancelling credit cards.

AIM Terms of Service, Part 2

It seems that the massive amount of attention to the recent changes in the AIM terms of service have hit hard at AOL. Evidently “America Online Inc. plans to make three small but significant modifications to the terms of service for its AIM instant messaging product” due to all the recent attention. AOL is planning on making a few changes to “Content You Post” section “and will explicitly exclude user-to-user chat sessions from the privacy rights an AIM user gives up to AOL.”

“We’re not making any policy changes. We’re making some linguistic changes to clarify certain things and explain it a little better to our users,” AOL spokesperson Andrew Weinstein told eWEEK.com.

The modifications will use similar language from the AIM privacy policy to “make it clear that AOL does not read private user-to-user communications,” Weinstein said.

“We’ll be adding that to the beginning of the section to make it clear that the privacy rights discussed in that section only refer to content posted to public areas of the AIM service.”

More importantly, Weinstein said a blunt and inelegant line that reads “You waive any right to privacy” will be deleted altogether.

“That’s a phrase that should not have been in that section in the first place. It clearly caused confusion, with good reason,” Weinstein conceded.

In the end it seems that the “mis-wording” of the terms of service caused enough commotion to be changed. As of this post the “Content You Post” section of the terms of service has been re-written to:

Content You Post to Public Areas
As explained in detail in the AIM Privacy Policy, AOL does not read your private online communications when you use any of the communication tools on AIM Products. If, however, you use these tools to post Content or other information to public areas on AIM Products (for example, in chat rooms or online message boards), other online users will have access to this information and Content.

You may only post Content to public areas on AIM Products that you created or which the owner of the Content has given you permission to post. You may not post or distribute Content to public areas on AIM Products that is illegal or that violates these Terms of Service. By posting or submitting Content to public areas of AIM Products, you represent and warrant that (i) you own all the rights to this Content or are authorized to use and distribute this Content to public areas of AIM Products and (ii) this Content does not and will not infringe any copyright or any other third-party right nor violate any applicable law or regulation.

You or the owner of the Content retain ownership of all right, title and interest in Content that you post to public areas of any AIM Product. However, by submitting or posting Content to public areas of AIM Products (for example, posting a message on a message board or submitting your picture for the “Rate-A-Buddy” feature), you grant AOL, its parent, affiliates, subsidiaries, assigns, agents and licensees the irrevocable, perpetual, worldwide right to reproduce, display, perform, distribute, adapt and promote this Content in any medium. Once you submit or post Content to any public area on an AIM Product, AOL does not need to give you any further right to inspect or approve uses of such Content or to compensate you for any such uses. AOL owns all right, title and interest in any compilation, collective work or other derivative work created by AOL using or incorporating Content posted to public areas of AIM Products.

Now although I am happy to know that AOL is not reading my private messages I write or receive to other people, I still think it is pretty crappy that could potentially make money off of something someone else did without there expressed permission. Oh well, life goes on.

Building In A Bag

It seems that a pair of engineers in London who are persuing their master’s degree have come up with an idea for a building-in-a-bag. The article over at wired.com explains that the idea is to have “a sack of cement-impregnated fabric. To erect the structure, all you have to do is add water to the bag and inflate it with air. Twelve hours later the Nissen-shaped shelter is dried out and ready for use. ”

This idea has huge potential for any situation where sturdy shelter is needed and needed soon. Such as war zones and areas ravaged by a natural disaster.

Aid agency chiefs have been impressed by the simplicity and economy of the idea. A bag weighing 230 kilograms (approximately 500 pounds) inflates into a shelter with 16 square meters (172 square feet) of floor space. Cost is estimated at £1,100 ($2,100), while an equivalent-size Portakabin (a type of portable building widely used in the United Kingdom) costs about £4,000 ($7,700). The same-size tent costs about £600 ($1,150).

The comparative cost and ease of use are substantial. This is one inovation in the area of concrete use that has great potential to help out in a lot of ways all over the world.